Tennessee property management firms employ 3,840 employees statewide. Our pattern of Tennessee property management firms consists of thirteen places across two (2) MSAs: Chattanooga and Memphis. Our sample of South Carolina property management firms contains 17 places across three (3) MSAs: Columbia, Greenville, and Spartanburg. Our pattern of Washington property management corporations contains 20 areas across three (3) MSAs: Seattle, Spokane, and Vancouver. Our pattern of Oregon property management firms consists of 12 areas across two (2) MSAs: Corvallis and Portland. Our sample of Utah property management firms consists of 25 areas across two (2) MSAs: Salt Lake City and St. George. Two (2) property management companies from the Oregon pattern advertise inspection charges, charging $75.00 and $150.00, respectively. Among property management companies from the Utah pattern that cost inspection fees, the typical cost is $78.67 each. Among the many few property management corporations from the South Carolina pattern that advertise inspection fees, the common price is $76.33 every. Among property management firms from the Texas pattern that charge inspection charges, the typical price is $117.25 every. Texas property management companies employ 22,820 workers statewide. Utah property management companies make use of 2,640 workers statewide. Washington property management corporations employ 2,400 staff statewide.

Among surveyed property management corporations from the Washington pattern that disclose a management payment, the typical charge is 9.40% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management companies from the Oregon sample that disclose a management payment, the typical charge is 8.43% of collected rent. Among the many few property management companies that publicize setup services, the average fee is $293.00 each. Among the many few firms from the new Mexico sample that disclose the cost of tenant placement bundled with management companies, the common rate is 60.00% of 1 month’s rent. Among corporations from the Utah sample that charge a flat charge for lease renewal, the typical fee is $177.14. Among the few property management corporations from the brand new Mexico pattern that publicize lease renewal charges, the average flat price is $62.33. Companies from the North Carolina pattern that advertise a charge for lease renewal cost a median of $153.00 every. Property management companies from the Tennessee sample that publicize lease renewal fees cost a mean flat charge of $189.29.

Property management firms from the South Carolina sample that advertise a flat price for lease renewal cost a mean monthly fee of $231.80. Companies from the Washington pattern that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management services charge an average charge of 70.4% of collected rent. Companies from the Texas sample that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management companies cost a median price of 76.6% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management firms from the Texas pattern that disclose a management fee, the typical charge is 8.87% of collected rent or a flat charge of $100.80. Among surveyed property management corporations from the South Carolina sample that disclose a management charge, the typical charge is 9.08% of collected rent. 83.9% is the common charge for tenant placement solely among Texas property management companies that cost a percentage of unit rent. Setup fees range from $99.00 to $350.00 amongst companies from the Texas sample that disclose such fees. Advertised setup fees range from $150.00 and $495.00 among the few companies from the Tennessee pattern that disclose such charges. Among the many few property management corporations from the Tennessee pattern that cost inspection charges, expenses range from $75.00 to $198.00 each.

Among the few corporations that cost a flat fee for tenant placement solely, common fees range from $600.00 to $999.00. Among surveyed property management firms from the new Mexico sample that disclose a management price, the typical charge is 9.79% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management firms from the North Carolina pattern that disclose a management payment, the average rate is 8.89% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management corporations from the Tennessee sample that disclose a management fee, the average rate is 8.86% of collected rent. 62.5% is the average charge for tenant placement solely amongst Oregon property management companies that cost a proportion of unit rent. 80.7% is the common price for tenant placement solely among Washington property management companies that charge a proportion of unit rent. Companies from the Utah pattern that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management companies charge a median rate of 39.8% of collected rent. Companies from the South Carolina pattern that disclose the cost of tenant placement bundled with management services cost a median price of 67.7% of collected rent. Companies from the North Carolina pattern that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management companies charge a mean charge of 54.5% of collected rent.